The pathogenesis of CE in children with DKA is controversial. There are those who
propose that it is caused by excessive administration of IV fluids and cerebral
osmotic shifts. Alternatively it might be caused by cerebral hypoperfusion and
reperfusion during DKA treatment. Should we be giving more fluid or less fluid…
Who knows?
In an ideal world, we would answer this question by
conducting a large randomized control trial in the sickest subset of children.
These are the kids who develop CE. We would randomize two groups. One gets lots
of fluids and the other not so much. The primary outcome would be death as this
is usually caused by cerebral oedema. Unfortunately such a study would be near impossible to conduct given the rarity
of clinical apparent CE in children with DKA.
The authors of this paper perhaps tried the next best thing. They conducted an RCT
using 2 different rehydration protocols (but some would argue were not that
different). In the end, one group got 60ml/kg and the other 40ml/kg in the first
8 hours. They used the “apparent diffusion coefficient” on serial MRI’s as a
surrogate marker to look for cerebral oedema. All of kids recovered well.
The conclusion of the
paper? Cerebral oedema does not appear to be substantially affected by the
rate of IV fluid administration.
But hold on a minute… There
were only 18 children included in this study. Clearly there would have only
been enough statistical power to find very large differences in the study arms.
In addition, one might question the validity of the surrogate marker looking
for subclinical CE. The conclusion as
written in the paper clearly overstates any reasonable interpretation of this
study.
In the end, this paper raises
more questions than it answers. It certainly would raise the hypothesis
(again) calling for a large RCT which will probably never happen.
Before we get too critical, we should remember that the lead
author, Dr Nicole Glaser, a
professor of pediatric endocrinology at UC Davis has done some fantastic work well over the past
decade looking at this subject. (Remember NEJM 2001;344(4):264-269?) This is a
very challenging niche of research and we see look forward to see more of her
work.
Examining:
Glaser NS, Wootton-Gorges SL, Buonocore MH et al. Subclinical Cerebral Edema in Children With
Diabetic Ketoacidosis Randomized to 2 Different Rehydration Protocols.
Pediatrics 2013;131;e73-e80.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=subclinical+cerebral+edema+in+children+with+diabetic+ketoacidosis+randomized+to+2
No comments:
Post a Comment