I often wonder what we are trying to accomplish by
performing log roll examination in patients with trauma. Will our magical
fingers exclude spinal fractures?
Ok, I’ll acknowledge it clearly is useful in penetrating
trauma, finding wounds, and foreign bodies. (Interestingly, the most
interesting foreign body I ever found was a sawed-off shotgun. But this is
another story…)
This retrospective
cohort study conducted at the Alfred Hospital aimed to assess the utility of the log roll examination in unconscious (GCS <8)
trauma patients for the diagnosis of soft tissue and thoracolumbar spine
injury.
Examination findings as documented in the medical record
were compared to the CT and/or MRI reports.
The had 402 cases
that met inclusion criteria with 35% having thoracolumbar fracture. Yes, quite
a banged-up cohort.
The sensitivity
of log roll?
27%
Specificity was found to be reasonable at 91%. The log-roll
also found soft tissue injury, open wounds, burns and glass but no firearms.
Of course, there are several
issues with this paper. The retrospective data charted in the medical record was likely incomplete. There was only a single data abstractor
not blinded to the study intentions and a few other problems.
But I’m willing to believe the conclusions.
“Where CT is
available, we recommend examination during log roll be limited to visual
inspection only, in unconscious trauma patients.”
Some might argue… well, what’s the harm? Fair enough, but
palpating is clearly a waste of time in a cohort getting CT anyway.
So, you’ll have to find another place to stick those magical
fingers... Just sayin'
Covering:
No comments:
Post a Comment